Keyword summary
40% 1 analyzed article/video 1,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Bill 958 results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 556 hits . Analysis detected 2,061 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,080 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 34% (39,717 of 59,735 keywords). This Senate Bill 958 is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group. Senate Bill 958
Keyword details
Total words: 4,080
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst