Keyword summary
56% 1 analyzed article/video 2,206 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science Policy results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 1,452 hits . Analysis detected 6,354 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,824 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 36% (37,988 of 59,391 keywords). This Science Policy is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group. Science Policy
Keyword details
Total words: 8,824
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.5% 16.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst