Keyword summary
18% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,283 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Santa Barbara County results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 364 hits . Analysis detected 2,342 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,126 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 15% (51,221 of 59,653 keywords). This Santa Barbara County is better (less manipulative) than 85.90% of the peer group. Santa Barbara County
Keyword details
Total words: 6,126
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.1% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.9% Straw Man: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst