Keyword summary
ā 63% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sacred Sites results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 651 hits . Analysis detected 6,097 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,948 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ā 26% (44,581 of 59,694 keywords). This Sacred Sites is better (less manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group. Sacred Sites
Keyword details
Total words: 8,948
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst