Keyword summary
⁠27%2 analyzed articles/videos1,248 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Russian Navy results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 351 hits. Analysis detected 2,407 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,992 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (44,543 of 59,653 keywords). This Russian Navy is better (less manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Russian Navy
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠26%Russian Navy (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,992
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

25% percentile
025507510025.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos