Keyword summary
90% 1 analyzed article/video 358 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rules Controversy results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Overconfidence Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 282 hits . Analysis detected 1,568 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,432 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 81% (11,339 of 59,653 keywords). This Rules Controversy is worse (more manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group. Rules Controversy
Keyword details
Total words: 1,432
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.0% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.2% 15.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst