Keyword summary
29% 2 analyzed articles/videos 804 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Role Model results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , In-Group Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 667 hits . Analysis detected 2,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,374 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (43,294 of 56,288 keywords). This Role Model is better (less manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group. Role Model
Keyword details
Total words: 7,374
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst