Keyword summary
54% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,871 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Robin Williams results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.2% saturation with 2,412 hits . Analysis detected 6,388 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,484 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 60% (24,247 of 59,653 keywords). This Robin Williams is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group. Robin Williams
Keyword details
Total words: 7,484
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.4% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 32.2% 32.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 32.2%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst