Keyword summary
19% 1 analyzed article/video 1,151 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Richmond Restaurants results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Representativeness Heuristic , and Negativity Bias , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 188 hits . Analysis detected 1,736 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 18% (49,194 of 59,383 keywords). This Richmond Restaurants is better (less manipulative) than 82.80% of the peer group. Richmond Restaurants
Keyword details
Total words: 4,604
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.2% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% No True Scotsman: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst