Keyword summary
96%2 analyzed articles/videos1,705 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regional Planning Commissions results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 1,632 hits. Analysis detected 9,933 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,820 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 79% (12,780 of 59,653 keywords). This Regional Planning Commissions is worse (more manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group.
Regional Planning Commissions
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
79%Regional Planning Commissions (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,820
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

79% percentile
025507510078.6% percentile
3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 16.8%16.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 23.9%23.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos