Keyword summary
24%1 analyzed article/video479 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pterosaur results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Overconfidence Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 179 hits. Analysis detected 1,317 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 60% (24,290 of 59,653 keywords). This Pterosaur is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Pterosaur
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
60%Pterosaur (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,916
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510059.3% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.3%9.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos