Keyword summary
74%1 analyzed article/video812 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Post Polio Syndrome results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 348 hits. Analysis detected 2,645 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 59% (24,800 of 59,653 keywords). This Post Polio Syndrome is worse (more manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group.
Post Polio Syndrome
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
59%Post Polio Syndrome (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,248
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

58% percentile
025507510058.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos