Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Planned Giving results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 0.9% saturation with 168 hits . Analysis detected 1,037 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,110 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 52,235 keywords). This Planned Giving is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Planned Giving
Keyword details
Total words: 19,110
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles19.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst