Keyword summary
94%1 analyzed article/video210 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Patrick Drupp results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.6% saturation with 249 hits. Analysis detected 1,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 840 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of 96% (2,201 of 53,020 keywords). This Patrick Drupp is worse (more manipulative) than 95.90% of the peer group.
Patrick Drupp
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
96%Patrick Drupp (selected)10%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 840
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

96% percentile
025507510095.9% percentile
9.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles840 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 24.9%24.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 22.9%22.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 26.9%26.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 12.9%12.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 12.9%12.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.0%7.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 29.6%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 26.9%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 12.9%, sitewide 3.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 1.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos