Keyword summary
24% 16 analyzed articles/videos 25,586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Omaha results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Anecdotal , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 7,418 hits . Analysis detected 38,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 110,500 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of 1% (59,047 of 59,653 keywords). This Omaha is better (less manipulative) than 99.00% of the peer group. Omaha
Keyword details
Total words: 110,500
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.0% percentile 0.7% BS Score16 analyzed articles110.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst