Keyword summary
85%1 analyzed article/video566 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Numat Technologies results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 368 hits. Analysis detected 2,432 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 84% (8,784 of 54,563 keywords). This Numat Technologies is worse (more manipulative) than 83.90% of the peer group.
Numat Technologies
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
84%Numat Technologies (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,264
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

84% percentile
025507510083.9% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 15.2%15.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 16.3%16.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos