Keyword summary
82% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,820 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Morning Edition results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 558 hits . Analysis detected 5,554 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,854 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 37% (36,389 of 57,480 keywords). This Morning Edition is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. Morning Edition
Keyword details
Total words: 6,854
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst