Keyword summary
72% 28 analyzed articles/videos 18,990 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Legislative Session results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 6,313 hits . Analysis detected 59,215 faulty-reasoning hits from 84,066 analyzed words across 28 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 13% (52,007 of 59,653 keywords). This Missouri Legislative Session is better (less manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group. Missouri Legislative Session
Keyword details
Total words: 84,066
Article count: 28
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.8% percentile 1.3% BS Score28 analyzed articles84.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst