Keyword summary
65%1 analyzed article/video574 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Milwaukee Journal Sentinel results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 173 hits. Analysis detected 1,185 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 50% (30,335 of 59,653 keywords). This Milwaukee Journal Sentinel is better (less manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
50%Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,296
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

49% percentile
025507510049.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos