Keyword summary
8%2 analyzed articles/videos1,129 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michigan Primary Election results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Hasty Generalization, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 3.7% saturation with 168 hits. Analysis detected 1,109 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,516 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 5% (56,729 of 59,653 keywords). This Michigan Primary Election is better (less manipulative) than 95.10% of the peer group.
Michigan Primary Election
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
5%Michigan Primary Election (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,516
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

5% percentile
02550751004.9% percentile
1.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos