Keyword summary
6% 1 analyzed article/video 1,787 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Cathcart results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , In-Group Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 256 hits . Analysis detected 1,461 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,148 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 3% (52,506 of 53,750 keywords). This Michael Cathcart is better (less manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group. Michael Cathcart
Keyword details
Total words: 7,148
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.3% percentile 0.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Tu Quoque: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst