Keyword summary
30% 1 analyzed article/video 1,896 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mccormack Dickstein Committee results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 424 hits . Analysis detected 3,495 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,584 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 19% (48,606 of 59,653 keywords). This Mccormack Dickstein Committee is better (less manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group. Mccormack Dickstein Committee
Keyword details
Total words: 7,584
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst