Keyword summary
67% 1 analyzed article/video 1,394 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Massachusetts Election results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 433 hits . Analysis detected 3,730 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,576 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 33% (40,079 of 59,653 keywords). This Massachusetts Election is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group. Massachusetts Election
Keyword details
Total words: 5,576
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.8% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst