Keyword summary
39%1 analyzed article/video384 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Martha Reeves results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 193 hits. Analysis detected 865 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,536 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 74% (15,449 of 58,127 keywords). This Martha Reeves is worse (more manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Martha Reeves
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
74%Martha Reeves (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,536
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

73% percentile
025507510073.4% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.6%12.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos