Keyword summary
70% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,582 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mamdani Administration results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 1,781 hits . Analysis detected 15,026 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,661 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 22% (43,677 of 55,438 keywords). This Mamdani Administration is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group. Mamdani Administration
Keyword details
Total words: 21,661
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.2% percentile 1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles21.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst