Keyword summary
18% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,596 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mail Theft results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 715 hits . Analysis detected 3,314 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,919 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 8% (55,214 of 59,653 keywords). This Mail Theft is better (less manipulative) than 92.60% of the peer group. Mail Theft
Keyword details
Total words: 9,919
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.4% percentile 1.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst