Keyword summary
38%2 analyzed articles/videos1,845 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Low Income Families results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 876 hits. Analysis detected 4,970 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,352 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 13% (48,584 of 55,583 keywords). This Low Income Families is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group.
Low Income Families
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
13%Low Income Families (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 12,352
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

13% percentile
025507510012.6% percentile
1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos