Keyword summary
59% 1 analyzed article/video 1,455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Loop Weather Bell results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 742 hits . Analysis detected 4,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 43% (32,838 of 57,618 keywords). This Loop Weather Bell is better (less manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group. Loop Weather Bell
Keyword details
Total words: 5,820
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.0% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst