Keyword summary
88%1 analyzed article/video627 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Livestock Loss Program results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 532 hits. Analysis detected 3,439 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,508 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 78% (13,552 of 59,278 keywords). This Livestock Loss Program is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group.
Livestock Loss Program
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
78%Livestock Loss Program (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,508
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

77% percentile
025507510077.1% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 21.2%21.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 8.6%8.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 8.0%8.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.4%12.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.2%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 2.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos