Keyword summary
89% 21 analyzed articles/videos 9,267 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas City Chiefs results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 4,906 hits . Analysis detected 43,102 faulty-reasoning hits from 46,166 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 30% (40,087 of 57,281 keywords). This Kansas City Chiefs is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group. Kansas City Chiefs
Keyword details
Total words: 46,166
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score21 analyzed articles46.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst