Keyword summary
18%1 analyzed article/video573 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jules Hurst Iii results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 229 hits. Analysis detected 937 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 55% (26,893 of 59,653 keywords). This Jules Hurst Iii is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Jules Hurst Iii
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
55%Jules Hurst Iii (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,292
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

55% percentile
025507510054.9% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Special Pleading: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos