Keyword summary
74% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,485 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Juan Ciscomani results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 832 hits . Analysis detected 6,466 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,940 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 64% (21,718 of 59,653 keywords). This Juan Ciscomani is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group. Juan Ciscomani
Keyword details
Total words: 5,940
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.6% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Straw Man: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst