Keyword summary
76% 2 analyzed articles/videos 728 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jorge Elorza results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Special Pleading , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 323 hits . Analysis detected 2,617 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,546 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 57% (25,854 of 59,653 keywords). This Jorge Elorza is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group. Jorge Elorza
Keyword details
Total words: 3,546
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.7% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Special Pleading: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst