Keyword summary
54%2 analyzed articles/videos1,835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joint Task Force results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 826 hits. Analysis detected 5,028 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,687 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (45,882 of 59,653 keywords). This Joint Task Force is better (less manipulative) than 76.90% of the peer group.
Joint Task Force
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
24%Joint Task Force (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,687
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

23% percentile
025507510023.1% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos