Keyword summary
21% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,678 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jillian Gilchrest results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 641 hits . Analysis detected 6,543 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,712 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 6% (56,324 of 59,653 keywords). This Jillian Gilchrest is better (less manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group. Jillian Gilchrest
Keyword details
Total words: 14,712
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.6% percentile 1.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst