Keyword summary
9% 1 analyzed article/video 817 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jill Guttormson results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Availability Heuristic , and Anecdotal , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.8% saturation with 117 hits . Analysis detected 502 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,451 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 46% (29,721 of 54,933 keywords). This Jill Guttormson is better (less manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group. Jill Guttormson
Keyword details
Total words: 2,451
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst