Keyword summary
75% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,947 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Irvine results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 1,012 hits . Analysis detected 6,357 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,788 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 41% (33,724 of 56,844 keywords). This Irvine is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group. Irvine
Keyword details
Total words: 7,788
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.7% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst