Keyword summary
46% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,545 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Interstellar results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 1,220 hits . Analysis detected 7,517 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,180 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 22% (45,658 of 57,857 keywords). This Interstellar is better (less manipulative) than 78.90% of the peer group. Interstellar
Keyword details
Total words: 14,180
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst