Keyword summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video926 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Emergency Economic Powers Act Ieepa results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 461 hits. Analysis detected 2,730 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,704 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (19,708 of 58,055 keywords). This International Emergency Economic Powers Act Ieepa is worse (more manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
International Emergency Economic Powers Act Ieepa
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,704
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

66% percentile
025507510066.1% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos