Keyword summary
100%1 analyzed article/video557 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Illegal Vendors results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.3% saturation with 765 hits. Analysis detected 4,639 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,228 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.9% and a BS Rank of 93% (4,315 of 59,653 keywords). This Illegal Vendors is worse (more manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
Illegal Vendors
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
93%Illegal Vendors (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,228
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

93% percentile
025507510092.8% percentile
6.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 26.6%26.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 16.9%16.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 34.3%34.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 18.1%18.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 15.9%15.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.3%8.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 9.6%9.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 34.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 26.6%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos