Keyword summary
81%1 analyzed article/video283 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hypocrite results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 217 hits. Analysis detected 1,497 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 88% (7,209 of 59,653 keywords). This Hypocrite is worse (more manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group.
Hypocrite
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
88%Hypocrite (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,132
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

88% percentile
025507510087.9% percentile
5.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 12.6%12.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 8.8%8.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Keyword 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos