Keyword summary
61% 1 analyzed article/video 802 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hp Omnibook Ultra 14 results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 425 hits . Analysis detected 2,450 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,208 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 58% (22,317 of 52,116 keywords). This Hp Omnibook Ultra 14 is worse (more manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group. Hp Omnibook Ultra 14
Keyword details
Total words: 3,208
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.2% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst