Keyword summary
71% 1 analyzed article/video 1,042 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Housing Quality results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 602 hits . Analysis detected 2,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 60% (23,262 of 58,194 keywords). This Housing Quality is worse (more manipulative) than 60.00% of the peer group. Housing Quality
Keyword details
Total words: 4,168
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% No True Scotsman: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst