Keyword summary
47%1 analyzed article/video1,227 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Horrific Piazza Fontana Bombing results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 497 hits. Analysis detected 3,325 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 47% (31,935 of 59,657 keywords). This Horrific Piazza Fontana Bombing is better (less manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group.
Horrific Piazza Fontana Bombing
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
47%Horrific Piazza Fontana Bombing (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,908
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

47% percentile
025507510046.5% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4%Red Herring: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos