Keyword summary
38% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,583 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Futurama results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 1,051 hits . Analysis detected 3,329 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,332 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 37% (32,913 of 52,178 keywords). This Futurama is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group. Futurama
Keyword details
Total words: 6,332
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 16.6% 16.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 16.6%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst