Keyword summary
51% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,799 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Firearms Policy results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 1,337 hits . Analysis detected 11,749 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,160 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 11% (53,243 of 59,588 keywords). This Firearms Policy is better (less manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group. Firearms Policy
Keyword details
Total words: 21,160
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.6% percentile 1.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles21.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst