Keyword summary
56% 1 analyzed article/video 1,016 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Hardship results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hindsight Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 356 hits . Analysis detected 2,262 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,064 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 39% (32,213 of 52,177 keywords). This Financial Hardship is better (less manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group. Financial Hardship
Keyword details
Total words: 4,064
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
38% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.6% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst