Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Fighting Oligarchy Tour results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Tu Quoque , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.7% saturation with 475 hits . Analysis detected 3,049 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,838 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 59,653 keywords). This Fighting Oligarchy Tour is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Fighting Oligarchy Tour
Keyword details
Total words: 2,838
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.7% 16.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.8% 13.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Tu Quoque: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 0.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% No True Scotsman: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst