Keyword summary
87%1 analyzed article/video553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Fuels results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 42% saturation with 929 hits. Analysis detected 2,680 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 86% (8,369 of 57,947 keywords). This Energy Fuels is worse (more manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group.
Energy Fuels
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
86%Energy Fuels (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,212
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

86% percentile
025507510085.6% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 42.0%42.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.1%6.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Keyword 42.0%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos