Keyword summary
87% 1 analyzed article/video 553 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Fuels results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 42% saturation with 929 hits . Analysis detected 2,680 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,212 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 86% (8,369 of 57,947 keywords). This Energy Fuels is worse (more manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group. Energy Fuels
Keyword details
Total words: 2,212
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.6% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 42.0% 42.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Keyword 42.0%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst