Keyword summary
43%1 analyzed article/video739 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Enemies results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 385 hits. Analysis detected 1,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,956 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 49% (30,463 of 59,653 keywords). This Enemies is better (less manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Enemies
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
49%Enemies (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,956
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

49% percentile
025507510048.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.0%13.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Straw Man: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos